Christine Blasey Ford got extremely troubling news via one of her good friend’s over the weekend. In fact, this good friend gave the leftist professor a real gut punch that appears to be the death knell in her case against Brett Kavanaugh. Her name is Leland Ingham Keyser, and she caused Ford and her attorneys to freak out because of a nasty surprise from the summer of 1982. Don’t miss this.
If you’re confused about Christine Ford’s account of the alleged rape attempt by Brett Kavanaugh, you’re not alone. There is a good reason people are confused, Ford’s original account has changed a few times which brings us to her “lifelong friend” Leland Ingham Keyser.
Keyser was a classmate and good friend of Ford’s at Holton Arms, a private all-girls high school. According to Ford’s original account of the rape attempt, she attended this gathering sometime in the summer of 1982. “The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room,” reports the Washington Post, who broke the story.
Now, Ford has changed her story again. The leftist professor’s new claim is there was a total of five people at the gathering, three boys and one girl, and Ford. Leland Keyser was identified by Ford as the other girl, but she didn’t include her in the previous accounts for this ridiculous reason: Ford claims she knew Leland wouldn’t remember the party at all.
So what does Leland Keyser, who Blasely Ford reports to be her good friend, have to say about this party? Keyser gave this statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee via her attorney Howard Walsh, “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s, and it’s funny what people will say under penalty of possible perjury to the United States Senate. Lying under oath to a Senate Committee is a felony. Mrs. Keyser says she doesn’t know Kavanaugh and has never been at any party where he was present. That’s damning evidence especially when you include the others identified by Ford as being at this alleged 1982 gathering.
“I have no memory of this alleged incident,” said Mark Judge, who was named by Ford as being in the room during this alleged assault in a September 18 letter sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said he did not recall the party and never saw Brett Kavanaugh act in the matter Ford describes.
Patrick “PJ” Smyth is another so-called witness, who wrote, “I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post. I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”
So that’s three out of the five. Keyser, Judge, and Smyth, all denying they were there, with lifelong friend Keyser going as far as to say she has never been at any party where Kavanaugh was present.
That leaves Kavanaugh who stated under penalty of perjury, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.” So that leaves one person, Christine Blasey Ford.
According to the current accusations of Ms. Ford, there were five people present at the unknown residence, at the unknown time, at the unknown party.
Four of the people Ms. Ford claimed were present, including the accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh, now publicly state they have no knowledge of anything related to the accusation; including no recollection of any attendance at any gathering at a high school party claimed by Ms. Ford.
The only person left claiming attendance to a party — at the unknown time, on the unknown date, at the unknown residence — is the accuser, Mrs. Blasey Ford.
We should also mention the extent the Washington Post has gone to help Ford in what is shaping up to be a fantasy. WaPo broke this big story but omitted Leland Keyser from their reporting when they knew Ford had named her. Now, why would they do that?
Wall Street Journal reporter Kimberly Strassel tweets, “Other problem: WaPo’s reporting. Reporter has for a week had the names of those Ford listed as present. One is a woman. Yet it writes a story saying FOUR BOYS. Why? Maybe a mistake. But if so, why did WaPo never correct that narrative?”
Strassel follows that tweet up with, “In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: ‘Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware’.”
Strassel adds, “Wow. ‘Before her name became public, Ford told…’ That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford’s response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.”
Yes, we agree. A lot of people have a lot of questions to answer. Let’s start with Senator Dianne Feinstein who sat on this so-called bombshell for months as she plotted and planned the 11th-hour smear campaign. Now, exactly why would Ford agree to testify after all four of her witnesses deny ever being at any gathering?
We all know why. This isn’t about getting to the truth. I think we can all agree we have gotten to the truth. Christine Blasey Ford’s story has completely fallen apart. But, the Democrats want their pound of flesh which is why Blasey Ford will testify. So get ready for the circus, the screaming, the drama queens, and the tears. But in the end, the truth will prevail and Kavanaugh will be confirmed.